Publications
Advice for Attorneys
Initiatives
Bankruptcy
Cocounseling
Credit Counseling
Credit Discrimination
Debt Collection Abuse
Electronic Benefits Protection
E-Commerce
Energy and Utility
Immigrant Justice
Model State Law Preserving Individual Rights and Limiting Mandatory Arbitration
Mortgage Servicing
Predatory Small Loans
Predatory Lending Reform
Refund Anticipation Loan
Seniors Initiative
Student Loans
Sustainable Homeownership
Testimony and Comments
Conferences & Trainings
Jobs
 
 
Home > Initiatives > Testimony & Comments > Common mortgage lending practice found to violate consumer protections   Printer-friendly
 

PressRelease PressRelease PressRelease

Common Mortgage Lending Practice Found to Violate Consumer Protections

In an important victory for consumers, a federal Court of Appeals in Atlanta, Georgia has found a lender liable for paying referral fees to a loan broker as an incentive for the broker to jack up the interest rate in connection with the loan. Under the practice, which is common in the industry, lenders pay fees known as "yield spread premiums", to loan brokers in exchange for the broker finding borrowers who will pay above market interest rates. Consumer advocates have long argued that the practice is illegal under federal law and that it creates hidden incentives for brokers to mislead consumers about the cheapest available loan. HUD estimates that mortgage brokers handle about half of all home mortgage loans, or about 3 million mortgages per year totaling $333 billion.

According to Margot Saunders of the National Consumer Law Center (NCLC) in Washington, "lenders have argued that the fee is compensation for services rendered to the consumer. That argument was always ridiculous and now an important Federal Court has said so." She continued, "it is impossible to see how getting a borrower to pay a higher interest rate could ever be a service which a consumer would knowingly pay for."

The case, which is called Culpepper vs. Inland Mortgage Co., was resolved in the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on Friday January 9. The court pointed out that the Culpeppers had already made a separate payment to their loan broker for its services. The Court found that the additional payment of the yield spread premium by the lender was for referring business, a service which is not compensable under a federal law known as the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ("RESPA").

According to Elizabeth Renuart, also of NCLC, "this is a major victory for consumers. At a time when Congress is being heavily lobbied by the lending community for additional deregulation, this case is a reminder that the consumer protections remain necessary in order to protect against practices designed to confuse and disadvantage borrowers." Saunders says, "Congress will undoubtedly face heavy pressure from the industry to legitimize this clearly abusive practice. Hopefully, Congress will stand with consumers to protect them against being trapped and mislead into paying above market prices for their loans."

The National Consumer Law Center serves as an advocate for low-income consumers on consumer lending reforms being pressed by banks and other lenders. In addition, NCLC publishes materials for lawyers and consumers, including the nationally acclaimed book Surviving Debt: A Guide for Consumers. NCLC has trained lawyers and counselors nationwide on consumer protection issues relevant to low-income consumers.


Jobs | Unreported Cases | Useful Links | Site Map | Contact Us
National Consumer Law Center, 7 Winthrop Square, Boston, MA 02110
© Copyright, National Consumer Law Center, Inc., All rights reserved.